Essays On Rawls Theory Of Justice

John Rawls' A Theory Of Justice

John Rawls' A Theory of Justice

John Rawls' "A Theory of Justice" has long been revered as a marvel of modern political philosophy. It's most well-known for the two principles of justice outlined by Rawls: (1) that all persons have an equal right to liberty; and (2) that (a) all inequalities in society should be arranged to benefit the least advantages, and (b) that all positions and offices should be open and accessible as outlined by fair equality of opportunity. Rawls' conception of society, as a "co-operative venture for mutual gain", forms the basis for both principles, and he is at all times concerned with creating a stable concept of fair and just society. Rawls' second principle, dealing with distributive justice and equality of opportunity, outlines a theoretical procedure whereby the maximum social primary goods (i.e. wealth, health, respect, happiness) can be distributed o those with the minimum advantages ("maximin").

Rawls introduces this concept by establishing a social contract between people behind a "veil of ignorance". This veil would remove the identity and characteristics from an individual (age, sex, social status, race, religion, etc.) so that he or she would be forced to support a Basic Social Structure (where controls are set on the activities of individuals to maximize total primary goods and liberties) that is fair, just and equal. Rawls reasons that all inequalities that do not arise from such social circumstances are just, and therefore searches for a way to make social inequalities fair. In accordance with his policy of "justice as fairness", Rawls creates, and later defends, what is known as the "difference principle" (principle of justice #2). This principle stipulates that those who are advantaged by social and natural circumstances should redistribute their primary social goods to the least advantages. This principle seems fair, as all social endowments are arbitrary and should not affect one's fate. Rawls' "difference principle" also seems reasonable because it removes unjust social advantages without actually altering the advantaged's endowments (which would be almost impossible, as seen in Vonnegut.)

While Rawls' amended principle does seem progressive, there are a few flaws and objections, as noted by such contemporaries as Kymlicka....

Loading: Checking Spelling

0%

Read more

This paper compares two famous political philosophers John Rawls and Robert Nozick and their approaches to social justice

1612 words - 6 pages Aisalkyn AlimbaevaReflection PaperSocial JusticeJohn Rawls and Robert Nozick: are their approaches to justice reconcilable?Accoding to the theory of deprivation, people sense injustice when they...

Rawls' Principles of Justice Essay

1361 words - 5 pages Given the opportunity to determine the basic structure of society, I would try to come up with a structure that would benefit everyone not just those at the top of the ladder. Today, mainly because of how our society is shaped, those at the bottom are almost literally stuck at the bottom against a double edged sword. They try to climb out of the pit of poverty only to be held back by the pit of poverty. We have people who are famous for being...

Human Rights and John Rawls The Law of Peoples

3834 words - 15 pages Human Rights and John Rawls The Law of Peoples Abstract: Which political and juridical foundation can justify the transit from the Western, particular, to the universal? John Rawls tries to answer this question in his article, "The Law of Peoples," proposing a kind of contract or agreement. A first agreement should be attained among liberal-democratic societies on a few political and social issues such as human rights. Then this agreement...

Rawl's Theory of Justice

1325 words - 5 pages The phenomenon of adaptive preferences is describes as an individual having a desired goal but when they see themselves not being able to achieve the goal, they gradually start to lose their interest and desire for the goal. Since the goal becomes unattainable, the individual then tries to convince himself that the goal was not worth striving for. This phenomenon might be used to criticize some utilitarian theories because the theory does not...

Community for Justice A Communitarian Critique of Traditional Liberal Theory

1484 words - 6 pages Communitarians cannot accept liberal theory. It fails to pay mind to the essence of what makes human beings function as social creatures. And while it continues to stray from its beginnings it can no longer satisfy what is necessary for an acceptable political theory. Communitarians view this distance from the original theory their main objection to liberal theory. Instead an ideal communitarian theory would involve “a more contextual and...

Political Theory of John Locke

1341 words - 5 pages John Locke: Account of Political Society What would the American government be like today if it was not for the mind and political theory of John Locke? Some historians and philosophers believe that without John Locke our government would only be a shadow of what it is today. Arguably, one of his most important political and philosophical works was his Two Treatises of Government. There he argues that the function of the state is to...

John Locke's Theory of Knowledge

2440 words - 10 pages I. General Notions Francis Bacon and Thomas Hobbes were not truly conscious of the phenomenalistic consequences of their theory of knowledge, which was based on empiricism. Both considered sensation as phenomenal presentations and also as representations of reality. Thus they still had something upon which to build an absolute metaphysics. With Locke gnosiological phenomenalism enters its critical phase. By considering sensations merely as...

John Locke's Theory of Knowledge

1554 words - 6 pages John Locke (1632-1704) was the first of the classical British empiricists. (Empiricists believed that all knowledge derives from experience. These philosophers were hostile to rationalistic metaphysics, particularly to its unbridled use of speculation, its grandiose claims, and its epistemology grounded in innate ideas) If Locke could account of all human knowledge without making reference to innate ideas, then his theory would be simpler, hence...

John Locke's Theory of Knowledge

1555 words - 6 pages John Locke was an empiricist who believed that people could acquire knowledge from experience. Ideas acted as raw materials and by knowing the relation of the ideas, we got knowledge. All ideas are based on experience but knowledge can also be justified by intuition and demonstration. By sensation and reflection, we get sensitive, intuitive and demonstrative knowledge with different degrees of certainty and ways of...

Regarding Rawls 'original position' and 'veil of ignorance' as well as critiques of his theory from Iris Marion Young

1944 words - 8 pages Q.2How does Rawls use ‘the original position’ and ‘the veil of ignorance’ to establish a conception of social justice? Your answer should define these terms and specify how Rawls characterizes them. You might also make reference to Rawls’ use of a contractarian methodology and the hypothetical contract.While society is a form of...

A Statement Of Justice

2102 words - 8 pages A Statement of Justice "I'm innocent I tell you! I'm innocent!" The door slammed shut with a bang. "Yeah, yeah tell it to the judge!", declared the guard. "I've been telling them I'm innocent from the day I got put in here." Leroy looked in the corner of the room and saw Paul sitting on the cold wet ground. "But I am innocent!" shouted Leroy. "Relax will...

INTRODUCTION

It is known that in the world which is based on the economic and political influences, on commerce and cultural differences, high incomes and social disparity between different countries and cities, social justice seems to be so remote and unachievable, that it is difficult to imagine and apply a well-organized system of political and personal liberties. However, John Rawls states that social justice is achievable. It is known that the famous Theory of Justice developed by John Rawls, an American philosopher, is considered to be one of the most important twentieth-century works of political philosophy and ethics. The Theory of Justice offers “a compelling alternative to the dominating utilitarian conception of social justice”. (Ponce, 1999, para.3)

According to his Theory of Justice, any society where social justice is supported and applied should consist only of free and equal people. All citizens should not only possess political and personal liberties, but also they should enjoy equal opportunities in all spheres of human activity and cooperative arrangements that will provide benefit to all members of society. Thus, according to John Rawls’ theory, all individuals who are the members of society should have equal rights and opportunities. Moreover, their society should be considered as a fair system where all members cooperate with each other in order to make life better. This system should be transferred from one generation to the next. (Ponce, 1999, para.2)

My goal in this paper is to discuss the theory of Justice developed by the famous American philosopher John Rawls and to apply this theory to Hong Kong by means of thorough analysis of the social and economic systems of Hong Kong and assessment of existing social welfare system in Hong Kong.

JOHN RAWL’S THEORY OF JUSTICE AND ITS MAIN OBJECTIVES AND PRINCIPLES

It is known that the Theory of Justice was developed by John Rawls in 1999. He discussed the main principles of his theory in the book A Theory of Justice. John Rawls tried to solve the problem of distributive justice.

The main objectives of the Theory of Justice developed by John Rawls

It is known that in the Theory of Justice, John Rawls calls for a principled regulation of both liberty and equality in human society. In this case, the outstanding American philosopher John Rawls takes into consideration the circumstances of justice inspired by the Scottish philosopher David Hume and a fair choice situation that is closely connected with the ideas of the famous German philosopher of 18-th century Immanuel Kant. The major principles of justice are considered to be the basis of the Theory of Justice. The main objectives of John Rawls are concluded in the fact that he wants to offer a special model of a fair choice situation which can help to choose acceptable principles of justice. Moreover, John Rawls believes that the individuals can find those principles of justice that will be especially attractive for them.

The main principles of John Rawls’ Theory of Justice

The Theory of Justice developed by Rawls is based on the fact that “Justice is the first virtue of social institution”. (Rawls 13) It means that a really good society is the one which is built according to the principals of justice. John Rawls states that there are many other theories of justice which have already been developed in the field of philosophy, but none of them is adequate. He writes in his book The Theory of Justice, “My guiding aim is to work out a theory of justice that is a viable alternative to these doctrines which have long dominated our philosophical tradition.” (Rawls 5) That is why he calls his justice theory which has the major goal – to formulate a clear conception of the fundamental structure of society according to two social justice principles, justice theory as fairness.

Moreover, John Rawls states that his essential principles of justice which should be used for creating a good society are very important because they “provide a way of assigning rights and duties in the basic institutions of society” and help to organize this society in a proper way. (Rawls 25)

The first principle of John Rawls’ Theory of Justice is the liberty principle. It states that “each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive scheme of equal basic liberties compatible with a similar scheme of liberties for others.” (Rawls 43) It means that there are different types of liberty and that some of them are more suitable for a just society including freedom of thought, liberty of conscience, freedom of person and the civil liberties. Besides, the first principle of the theory of justice should not be violated. Rawls argues that different liberties may conflict with each other; that’s why it is very important to trade them off against each in order to obtain the largest and effective system of rights.

The second principle of John Rawls’ Theory of Justice is called the difference principle. It defines how economic resources should be distributed in a good society. This principle consists of two parts. The first part discusses the distribution of acquired or purchased wealth in the society. It refers to regulation of taxation and redistribution of wealth in the state. The second part of this principle is the so-called principle of equal opportunity. It regulates access to those social positions that are considered to be prestigious in the society, including good jobs and positions of authority. Rawls states that the second principle of the Theory of Justice “applies, in the first approximation, to the distribution of income and wealth and to the design of organizations that make use of differences in authority and responsibility, or chains of command”. (Rawls 62) The second part of the principle is based on anti-discrimination.

Some experts call the difference principle as the principle of positive liberty because it is based in the fact that negative liberty is insufficient.

 

References

Ponce, P. (1999) The Philosophy of Justice: John Rawls. Humanities. Vol.20. Issue 6. Retrieved from:
< http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5037667347>
McLaughlin, E. (1993). Hong Kong: A residual welfare regime. London: Sage Publications. Open University Press.
Rawls, J. (1975) A Theory of Justice. Original edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

0 comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *