Conflict in the Workplace Essay
905 Words4 Pages
The scenario about drug testing in the workplace provided key lessons to consider in a negotiation. Those lessons influenced the way I approach a negotiation and altered how I look at conflict in the workplace.
It is important to understand that, while a negotiation framework is helpful in problem solving, the structure of a framework is flexible. Prior to the negotiation, the situation created a clear framework. Terry, the truck driver, tested positive for drugs. As a consequence of is test results, Terry meet with his superior and a counselor to discuss his future at the company. The rule was very clear: drivers are tested for drugs. Initially, I viewed the rule as identical to policy, and a rigid rule left little room for negotiation.…show more content…
The framework must be flexible enough to absorb new information
Another reason for a flexible negotiation framework is consideration of fairness. Terry’s job was on the line and had everything to lose. In the scenario, the negotiation was emotionally charged and managers considered whether the punishment fit the crime. I had difficultly feeling remorse for Terry because of the stigma associated with drug use. He didn’t use drugs but it was his word against science, and there was no way to win the argument. In looking back, I considered other circumstances, such as if Terry had gotten a DUI during a vacation, and came to the conclusion that, while are consequences for breaking a corporate rule, further discussions about proper reprimand were necessary. The meeting between the superior, Employee Assistance Program representative and Terry allowed for questions of justice to arise. Bringing additional details and personal considerations into the discussion made it difficult to come to a solution, but it ensured that the policy fit the situation.
The question of justice will also influence how I will deal with conflict in the workplace. When addressing a situation, I tend to look at it through the filter of policy. For example, what does the policy say about Terry’s drug problem and what are the prescribed actions? Instead, I should look at in the reverse: does Terry’s drug problem fit within the policy and is
Are you an under-graduate, in College, Bachelors or under-taking your Post graduate studies and need someone to help write your essay or research? We offer premium quality essay writing help. All our papers are original, 0% plagiarized & uniquely written by our dedicated Masters specialists. My Essay Services is an experienced service with over 9 years experience in research writing of over 97,000 essays over the years. You will receive a plagiarism check certificate that confirms originality for any essay you order with My Essay Services. Fill the calculator on your right to begin placing your order now!
Essay on Managing Conflict at the Workplace
Conflict is inevitable whenever the human element is involved. However, conflict does not always have to produce negative results. It could also provide platforms for increasing team cohesion and overall employee productivity. This is, however, only the case if it is properly managed. This text provides insight on how conflict could be managed in a modern-day organization to produce optimal results.
Conflict Management in the Workplace
Conflict is an inevitable component of organizational life (Ini-Ojo et al, 2014). This is particularly so in the modern-day workplace, which is richly diverse in terms of religion, culture, ethnicity, and gender, and which practically faces more conflict than a more standardized workforce (Prause & Mujtaba, 2015). Researchers have attributed conflict in the workplace to multiple factors, including differences in goals, personality differences, differences in people’s ways of thinking, biases that people have against employees of other groups, and differences in capabilities (Ini-Ojo et al, 2014).
What is clear from the literature, however, is that workplace conflict, if not properly-managed could have damaging effects on employees’ mental, physical, and emotional well-being, eventually harming the organization’s goals and mission (Ini-Ojo et al, 2014; Prause & Mujtaba, 2015). However, if handled properly, conflict could be beneficial to both employees and the organization. Understanding conflict and effective ways of managing it is, therefore, essential for the well-being of employees and the organization (Singleton et al, 2011). This paper examines the different approaches that managers could use to manage and resolve conflicts in their organizations. It begins with a brief description of what conflict and conflict management is, and the My Essay Servicesprimary causes of conflict in the modern-day in the workplace.
What is Conflict?
The term ‘conflict’ has been defined differently by different researchers. In this text, conflict will be defined as the discord that arises when the values, interests, and goals of different groups/individuals are incompatible, causing those groups/individuals to thwart or attempt to block one another’s attempt to achieve the organization’s objectives (Jones & George, 2014). According to Suppiah and Rose (2006), conflict in the workplace is a result of contact between colleagues, departments, work groups, as well as between managers and their subordinates.
It is inevitable whenever components of the human element are involved (Suppiah & Rose, 2006). Conflict arising between individual colleagues is referred to as interpersonal conflict, whereas that arising between within a team, group, or department is referred to as intra-group conflict (Cupach et al, 2010). When conflict spreads outside a group or department, and involves members of different groups, it is referred to as inter-group conflict (Prause & Mujtaba, 2015).
Conflict management is the process of understanding and addressing disputes in an effective, balanced, and rational way (Utleg, 2012). In an organizational context, conflict management usually involves employing good negotiating, problem-solving, and effective communication skills to restore focus to the organization’s overall mission (Utleg, 2012).
Causes of Conflict in the Workplace
Conflict in the organizational setting arises when groups or individuals are trying to pool their effort towards achieving a common goal, but have contrary beliefs/opinions on the best plan of action. According to Utleg (2012), workplace conflicts could be categorized as either functional or dysfunctional.
Functional conflict is healthy, constructive disagreement between individuals or members of a group/team (O’Rourke & Collins, 2008). The conflicting parties differ in terms of opinion or ideas, but discuss their points of disagreement with an element of collaboration (Utleg, 2012). In an organizational setting, this kind of conflict is caused by such factors as:
i) competition for resources;
ii) differences in members’ communication or interpersonal capabilities’
iii) differences in viewpoints about issues relating to people’s age, gender, religion, or upbringing;
iv) comments or actions that cause stress;
v) biases that members have against people of other groups;
vi) personality differences, where people annoy each other because of how they act or think;
vii) members having goals that are inconsistent with each other; and
viii) differences in work approaches, where members have a common goal, but different plans of actions (Ini-Ojo et al, 2014).
Functional conflicts are particularly prominent in the modern-day workplace because of the rich diversity in terms of age, nationality, gender and religion occasioned by globalization. In case of this kind of conflicts, the manager’s responsibility is not to eliminate the conflict, but to manage it over time so that it enhances both the conflicting individuals and the organization (Utleg, 2012).
Dysfunctional conflict is the opposite of functional conflict – it is unhealthy, destructive disagreement between groups or individuals (Utleg, 2012). Dysfunctional conflict is embedded in the notion that organizations achieve their objectives by creating structures that perfectly define job functions, authorities, and responsibilities (Utleg, 2012). Conflict arises when these systems go contrary to employees’ expectations. In the workplace setting, this kind of conflict is triggered by such factors as stifling bureaucracy, disabling and disempowering cultures, unclear job requirements, heavy workloads, warring egos, favoritism, system problems, and dysfunctional work teams (Ini-Ojo et al, 2014).
It is prudent that managers adopt effective approaches for managing both functional and dysfunctional conflicts within their organization. This would help to ensure high levels of job satisfaction and increased productivity. Understanding the specific causes of conflict is fundamental to effective conflict management.
Managing Conflict in the Workplace
Strategies for Managing Conflict at the Workplace
Thomas and Killlman (as cited in Huan & Yaznadifard, 2012) identified five strategies that individuals could use to respond to conflict, and make decisions in an environment marred by conflict:
Competing: this is whereby an individual pursues their own interest at the expense of the other party (Jones & George, 2014). The individual forces, or uses their power and authority to satisfy their own desires, with total disregard for the wishes of the other party (Jones & George, 2014). The primary benefit of managing conflict in this way is that enhanced organizational decisions could be chosen if the enforcer is right (Huan & Yaznadifard, 2012). The core weakness of this strategy, however, is that ethical dilemmas are likely to result as the ‘forced’ party may be reluctant to act in a way that compromises their interests and principles (Jones & George, 2014). Moreover, anger and aggressions could develop between the conflicting parties, resulting in decreased productivity (Huan & Yaznadifard, 2012). My personal opinion is that this is a retrogressive way of managing conflict at the workplace because it ignores the fact that conflict exists, and does not eliminate the source of the conflict in the end.
Accommodating: this is whereby an individual neglects their own concerns in favor of the other party’s (Huan & Yaznadifard, 2012). This conflict-management style works best in cases where one of the conflicting parties is an expert in the given situation, and better-placed than the other party to offer effective solutions (Prause & Mujtaba, 2015). The core advantage of managing conflict in this way is that the relationship between conflicting parties is maintained (Huan & Yaznadifard, 2012). On the other hand, there is the likelihood that the more effective ideas may be missed (Huan & Yaznadifard, 2012).
Avoiding: in this case, an individual neither pursues their own concerns nor those of the other party (Prause & Mujtaba, 2015). This is often the case when one of the parties either pays no attention to the conflict or is not interested in winning (Prause & Mujtaba, 2015). It could also occur when one of the parties is unwilling to create tension, and only wishes for the problem to pass by (Prause & Mujtaba, 2015). This strategy helps to maintain the relationship between the conflicting parties; however, it does not resolve conflict. A study by Montoya-Weiss and his colleagues (2001) found that employing this conflict-management strategy hurts the relationship of a team in the long term. In my view, avoidance only makes the problem worse because it ignores the fact that conflict exists, and hence, it does nothing to reduce its symptoms.
Compromising: this is whereby an individual gives up their concerns after negotiations just so an agreement is reached (Huan & Yaznadifard, 2012). The individual changes their opinion and accepts the other party’s viewpoint, not because they agree, but because they wish to avoid continued confrontation (Huan & Yaznadifard, 2012). The main advantage of managing conflict this way is that it maintains relationships and helps to resolve conflicts faster; however, compromising only produces sub-optimum results (Huan & Yaznadifard, 2012). It resolves conflict temporarily.
Collaborating: this is where the conflicting parties work together to find a solution that is mutually-beneficial (Huan & Yaznadifard, 2012). The parties collaborate with each other, hearing each other out and expressing their concerns, with the aim of finding an outcome that is satisfactory to both parties (Huan & Yaznadifard, 2012). Collaboration is the best method of managing conflict because it creates a win-win scenario, which considers the wishes of both parties and allows the parties to analyze all ideas raised in a bid to create absolutely fresh and new outcomes.
Managers could rely on the collaborative style when managing conflicts to help create a positive environment in their workplaces. Moreover, through collaboration, optimum solutions are reached and new outcomes realized that would never have been realized with the other four styles of conflict-management. Collaboration is deemed to create a conflict-free environment in the workplace, and to increase positive outcomes within teams and in the organization as a whole. This then begs the question, ‘how exactly would a manager execute the collaborating style to effectively manage conflict among employees at the workplace?’
Researchers have devised different models for fostering collaboration between conflicting parties at the workplace. One such model is that formulated by Robinson (2010), which identifies eight steps that a manager ought to follow when resolving conflict in the workplace.
Executing the Collaborating Conflict-Management Style in the Workplace
Step 1: Set ground rules for constructive commitment
The first step in the collaboration process is to set the ground rules for how parties will interact and engage with each other at the workplace (Robinson, 2010). The manager needs to ask the conflicting parties to treat each other with respect, and to take time to listen and understand each other’s concerns. According to Robinson (2010), setting ground rules is important because people need rules and guidelines to govern their conduct. Assuming that everyone will just rise to the occasion and act like they are supposed to is naïve (Robinson, 2010).
Step 2: Select a facilitator
Supervision is paramount when a team environment is aggressive or marred by disagreement (Robinson, 2010). In some cases, the conflicting parties may be reasonable enough to deal with the situation themselves; other cases, however, will require the intervention of a facilitator, often another colleague or an executive. According to the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), managers should develop a culture of allowing employees to solve conflicts on their own (Lytle, 2015). The society recommends that executives only step in when the conflicting parties are threatening to quit over the issue, when the conflict is getting personal and parties are beginning to lose respect for each other, and when the conflict is affecting organizational success or employee morale (Lytle, 2015). Some situations may require help from outside the organization. These include:
i) when legal issues are involved such as allegations of harassment or discrimination;
ii) when the manager is not in a position to provide the required conflict-resolution assistance; and
iii) when there is a pattern of recurring issues, perhaps because the issues were not dealt with effectively previously (Lytle, 2015).
Regardless of whether the facilitator comes from within or outside the organization, it is prudent that he/she makes it clear to the parties that it is they (the parties) that are responsible for developing the solution – the facilitator’s only role is to facilitate the negotiation or discussion process (Lytle, 2015).
Step 3: Understand the details of the conflict and its history
The bottom-line here is to ask all participants to describe the conflict, and give their views on what they think the problem is, and how it started. The parties must give all relevant details about the conflict to make it possible for a solution to be found easily. All parties must be heard and given an opportunity to get involved in the resolution process (Huan & Yaznadifard, 2012). Huan and Yaznadifard (2012) caution that articulate and assertive parties may try to push their agenda as the less articulate parties shy off. This may cause the former to win the argument, leaving the other party offended and dissatisfied. To avoid this, the facilitator could direct the participants to use ‘I’ statements as opposed to ‘you’ statements, and to focus on specific problems and behaviors, rather than on people. Alternatively, the facilitator could allow each party to have its say without interruption, as the other takes notes rather than presenting a conflicting side of the story. They could then categorize the problem and have both sides brainstorm solutions. This strategy is often used by my current immediate supervisor to resolve minor conflicts within the department; and it often produces positive results.
Step 4: Checking for facts and clarifying on perceptions
Participants should be advised to verify the reality of the issue at hand, and not be quick to prove the other party’s arguments wrong. The facilitator should help the participants separate the facts from perceptions, and guide them to make judgment and decisions based on the former. He/she needs to help the participants maintain a calm attitude that allows them to probe the evidence and weigh the facts effectively to ensure that the conflict is resolved.
I personally recall one instance in one of my past jobs where a colleague from an older generation complained to my supervisor about the quality of my work. The colleague had made notes about when I was reporting to work, and my general work ethics. In her view, members of younger generations were lazy, had poor work ethics, and were quick to act without weighing the potential consequences of their actions. I, on the other hand, felt that those from older generations were inflexible in trying out new ventures. The supervisor summoned both of us to the conference room and provided us with checklists showing each other’s contribution to the team. The checklists provided a platform for us to weigh the actual facts about each other’s accomplishments, and use them to change our perceptions. Consequently, we were able to work progressively together for the benefit of the team.
Step 5: Identifying the parties’ individual as well as shared needs
It is prudent for the conflicting parties to understand each other’s real needs such as the need for independence and the need for achievement (Huan & Yaznadifard, 2012). The manager needs to have a clear view of the suggestions acceptable to both parties. This helps to prevent resistance to resolution (Huan & Yaznadifard, 2012). Understanding each party’s needs is crucial in helping the manager/facilitator reach a solution that is mutually-acceptable (Huan & Yaznadifard, 2012). One way to identify needs is to have both parties write down their desired changes and expectations.
Step 6: Come up with multiple solutions to the problem
In this step, the facilitator summarizes the conflict based on what they have heard, and obtains agreement from participants. Possible solutions could then be brainstormed, and participants invited to discuss all options in a positive manner (Huan & Yaznadifard, 2012). Huan and Yaznadifard (2012) posit that the advantage of developing multiple options to a problem is that if one option fails, you will still have other options as back up. Options that participants agree are unworkable should be ruled out. The final options that participants agree are workable could then be summarized.
Step 7: Develop next steps and ensure that all parties agree
Next steps are the stepping-stones along the path towards resolving conflict. They are the specific strategies that are executed in order for the final solution to be implemented. With each achievable step, participants are able to gauge their progress towards realizing the final solution, and resolving the conflict altogether. The next steps developed in this case should be acceptable to both parties. As Robinson (2010) points out, these steps help to build trust and to enhance relationships for working together.
Step 8: make mutually-beneficial agreements
Once acceptable options have been summarized and achievable next steps developed, the parties need to plan and come into an agreement. An agreement is mutually-beneficial if it recognizes and emphasizes the participants’ shared needs (Huan & Yaznadifard, 2012). Mutual affirmation is deemed to increase participants’ confidence levels, making them better-placed and more committed to handling challenges that may arise on the way (Robinson, 2010). Robinson (2010) cautions that it may not be possible to satisfy all of the participants’ needs during this phase; the bottom-line is to develop a decision-making rule that emphasizes the common goals and hence, generates the level of commitment needed from participants.
Robinson (2010) agrees that managers who follow these steps in resolving conflict within their organization are deemed to raise the performance and overall job satisfaction of their teams. Developing an environment where conflicts are resolved effectively makes employees more confident and more productive, given that they are able to spend more emotional energy on their work, and less energy on activities that are not helpful such as backstabbing and avoidance. Positive emotional energy spreads throughout the organization when conflicts are handled effectively, and consequently, overall productivity improves.
Managing Diversity-Related Conflict
The model suggested above can be used to resolve general conflicts at the workplace. The modern-day workplace, however, in addition to the conventional interpersonal conflicts, faces a new breed of conflict resulting from differences in personality, generation, culture, nationality, and ethnicity. Globalization and economic liberalization have made it easier for people to move across borders, and as a result, the workplace has become richly diverse. It is crucial that managers understand how to manage diversity-related conflict in their organizations so they are able to preserve working relationships as well as profitability and productivity in their organizations.
Woods (2010) expresses that diversity-related conflict can be managed through diversity training, which would make it possible for conflicting parties to be appreciative of the other party’s perspective, and hence, willing to collaborate. According to the author, “collaboration is not possible unless both parties arrive at an openness to try as best as they can to understand…the other’s perspective” (p.5).
Employees ought to be trained on how to interact with, and engage with people of different cultures, generations and ethnicity. This will go a long way towards not only preventing conflict among employees, but also helping them collaborate to resolve it amicably before it escalates to unprecedented levels. When employees understand the expectations of their colleagues from different backgrounds, it becomes relatively easy for them to understand their individual needs, goals and expectations. This potentially helps them to engage better in a collaborative framework to develop mutually-satisfying solutions whenever conflicts arise.
Managers and supervisors too ought to receive leadership training on how to effectively resolve diversity-related conflicts among their staff. Such training will equip them with skills on how to foster effective collaboration between conflicting parties, and how to devise solutions that are mutually-beneficial to all parties involved.
In summary, the 21st century society has made huge advances in the area of conflict management. Numerous studies have been conducted to increase the society’s knowledge in regard to conflict management and legal codes for promoting healthy workplaces. Nonetheless, the society continues to face challenges in managing conflict situations in diverse work environments. Conflict is a complex phenomenon that most of the time cannot be avoided whenever the human element is involved. However, conflict is not always detrimental; it could yield significant benefits to an organization if handled effectively. It is prudent that managers equip themselves with the skill on how to manage conflict in their workplaces. This will go a long way towards increasing productivity and overall job satisfaction. Maintaining an open mind, conflict management training, and diversity education are all beneficial strategies that the modern-day organization could use to ensure that conflict is effectively-managed.
Cupach, W. R., Canary, D. J. & Spitzberg, B. H. (2010). Competence in Interpersonal Conflict (2nd ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
Huan, L. J. & Yaznadifard, R. (2012). The Difference of Conflict Management Styles and Conflict-Resolution in the Workplace. Business and Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1), 141-155.
Ini-Ojo, B. E., Iyiola, O. O. & Osibanjo, A. O. (2014). Managing Workplace Conflicts in Business Environment: The Role of Alternative Dispute Resolution. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(36), 74-82.
Jones, G. R. & George, J. M. (2014). Contemporary Management (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Lytle, T. (2015). How to Resolve Workplace Conflicts. Society of Human Resource Management.
Montoya-Weiss, M. M., Massey, A. P. & Song, M. (2001). Getting it Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 251-1262.
O’Rourke, J. & Collins, S. (2008). Module 3: Managing Conflict and Workplace Relationships (2nd ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
Prause, D. & Mujtaba, B. G. (2015). Conflict Management Practices for Diverse Workplaces. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 6(3), 13-22.
Robinson, C. (2010). When Conflict Happens: Navigating Difficult Interactions in Senior Teams – Fostering a Culture of Constructive Engagement. Business Strategy Series, 11(4), 214-218.
Singleton, R., Toombs, L. A., Taneja, S., Larkin, C. & Pryor, M. G. (2011). Workplace Conflict: A Strategic Leadership Imperative. International Journal of Business & Public Administration, 8(1), 149-163.
Suppiah, W. & Rose, R. (2006). A Competence-Based View to Conflict Management. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 3(7), 1905-1909.
Utleg, F. B. (2012). Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict: An Organizational Life. Asian Educational Research Association, 3(1), 32-40.
Woods, S. (2012). Thinking about Diversity-Related Conflict: Respect, Recognition and Learning. Henderson Woods LLC Working Paper.